Friday, June 29, 2012

WE WERE WRONG

After attending the reorganization of Council meeting in 2011, we thought we had witnessed the most egregiously corrupt and dishonest activity possible for this administration.  WE WERE WRONG.

We attended the Special County Council meeting this morning and the activities we witnessed are almost beyond belief. If we weren't already aware of the depth of the corruption in our County government, we would think this episode was simply a nightmare.  Unfortunately, it was all too true.

This saga began at last Monday night's Council meeting.  Purely by mistake, Steve Davis, one of DD's coalition, lost his mind, did the right thing, and voted in the taxpayers' favor by rejecting the 2012/2013 budget.  Being as this mis-step left the ball in DD's court, we fully expected ramifications for this Councilman.  Maybe he was reminded that his new courthouse was not yet built or that his other perks for supporting DD's agenda were yet unrealized.  Whatever the provocation,  Mr. Davis became aware  he had pooped and stepped backwards in it so he decided he wanted to change his vote.

The administration saw the benefit in this change of heart but they realized the mechanics of rectifying this situation would be problematic.  Standing squarely in the path of fixing this unforeseen miscue were those pesky little things called RULES.  Easy solution: LIE.

First, there is a Rule that states: "The motion to reconsider allows county council to debate whether or not to overturn a decision made at the meeting that is in progress or at the immediately preceding meeting; provided, however, that third reading to an Ordinance may be reconsidered only at the same meeting in which the third reading was adopted.  Most intelligent people translate this phrase in the spirit in which it is meant and realize it should be interpreted as meaning "if FINAL ACTION was taken on an Ordinance".  But, BC's esteemed legal council latched onto the word "adopted" and ruled that, because the Ordinance was, in fact, not passed, this Rule didn't apply.  This argument, undeniably, was a stretch. Coincidentally, one of the authors of these Rules vehemently disagrees with the legal council's opinion as to the context of this Rule.

BUT, the next Rule leaves absolutely no wiggle room.  "If and when any one member of County Council objects to any item which is brought up for discussion and which has not been placed on or specifically identified on the official agenda, then that item will not be discussed at that meeting."  DD and the rest of his band of merry men knew very well that they intended to introduce a "Motion to Reconsider" when they scheduled this meeting but the Agenda did not reflect that intention.  The only item on today's agenda was "2012-2013 Budget".  There was no mention of the "Continuing Resolution" or the "Motion to Reconsider".  These people knew they were going to perpetrate this fraud before they started the meeting.  They assumed the vague, generalized agenda item would provide them cover for any and all activity.  That has not turned out to be the case.

There is a distinct possibility that this corrupt government has pushed the envelope to the breaking point this time.  Even people with very limited knowledge of the workings of government can understand what has happened.  Even these political novices are outraged. Our phones have been ringing off the hook.  We are amazed and heartened at just how rapidly the word is spreading.  It will be interesting to see how this shakes out.

10 comments:

Unknown said...

AS A FORMER BERKELEY COUNTY EMPLOYEE, NOTHING SURPRISES ME.
THERE IS NO WAY, IT SHOULD HAVE ENDED THE WAY IT DID TODAY.THERE IS A GROUP UNDER THE KING THAT DOES HIS BIDDING. WE NEED A STRONG PERSON TO RUN AGAINST THE KING AND CHANGE THINGS, MR GUNN IS A START. ROSIER HAD THE SAME SITUATION, BUT HE WAS WAY BETTER THAN THE LITTLE NAPOLEON.

Anonymous said...

Is there any legal recourse?

Anonymous said...

One of our Republican Council Members should ask the Attorney General for an opinion on this matter. The AG can only give opinions to elected officials so us lowly citizens can't ask ourselves. The press usually will
perk up if the AG finds rules were broken. Clearly 3rd reading and a final vote were taken Monday night. I assume someone objected to the motion to reconsider under the rules.

Anonymous said...

Send a message to the Governor's office at http://www.governor.sc.gov/Pages/SendMessage.aspx. She wants to clean up government.

Nosy Woman from Cross said...

This must be an interesting subject; 118 hits so far.

Anonymous said...

It appears that ALL of these 'anonymous' comments are written by the same mindset.. or.. person? Why is that?

Nosy Woman from Cross said...

Dear "Why is that", With our system, we moderate ALL comments prior to posting for bad language only. Otherwise, we publish ALL comments. We "could" click and identify the contributor if we wanted but we choose not to do so. After all these years, we can recognize the writing style of most contributors and, therefore, assure you all the comments do NOT come from the same person. It is rare for the same person to comment on the same post twice. Also, please do not blame us that it is a fact that this blog, with a few exceptions, only attracts comments from very intelligent, informed, astute, and Conservative readers. We hope this information answers your question.

Capt Elaine Magliacane said...

Well, well, well... Danny Boy is getting some final licks in before the game is OVER when Ken Gunn joins the Council. Corrupt county government... I too advised someone to send this along with links to the meeting video to the Alan Wilson... does BC need the STATE to protect taxpayers from the thieves on county council?

Anonymous said...

Since the Stormwater Fee is imminent under the direction of Dan Davis and Frank Carson, citizens located in those Districts that have unincorporated areas MUST DEMAND that their elected Councilmen vote against it! Some of the Districts, like 6, 7, and 8 have the financially poorest citizens and any Fee proposed by the County is NOT required by DHEC or necessary to satisfy the DHEC permit requirements. The County is already receiving ADEQUATE revenue via our taxes to cover costs associated with DHEC permit! County documents and certifications have already revealed that this is true! Based on the voting HABITS of Councilmen Jack Schurlknight, District 6 - Caldwell Pinckney, District 7 - and Steve Davis, District 8, YOU citizens MUST make YOUR feelings known to them, otherwise they will think you don't CARE and you have the extra money to GIVE to Dan Davis! Remember, while you may think that they represent YOU, they DON'T! They represent ONLY Supervisor Dan Davis!!

Anonymous said...

What is also interesting about the change in heart by Councilman Steve Davis is the fact that he is a practicing attorney in Moncks Corner and SHOULD know the what's right and wrong about following RUELES and LAWS established from which citizens, and YES, our own County should abide by! Tells me much about his skills and practices as an "attorney"! Not too "credible"! Also, our County paid attorney at the Council Meeting so confidently stating that because the Budget Bill was defeated, it would require 1st, 2nd, and 3rd readings AGAIN! Both attorneys have questionable "legal" skills!