GE&P is embarrassed to give you this update but here goes.
Finally, we have all the information on the Precinct Reorganization Make-up meeting, we think.
Supposedly, the meeting is to be held on Thursday, March 19, 2009, at Eagle Landing Club House, at 7PM. Please be aware that this information does not come from any official notification. There was nothing in the paper. There were no letters sent out. There were not even any phone calls made. You might say the information was disseminated by osmosis.
And, for those of you who are not familiar with this process, the make-up meeting is a gathering of all the precinct clubs in the county, which at last count numbered 49. All the folks who could not make it to the original meeting are supposed to come to this event to participate. At best, Eagle Landing Club House can comfortably hold 40 people, at best. This should be interesting.
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Thursday, March 12, 2009
METHOD TO THE MADNESS
It has come to the attention of GE&P that a larger than usual number of the folks are interested in the Precinct Reorganization process now being conducted by the BCGOP. Whether it is because of the developments on the National scene or the questionable decisions being made by politicians on the local level, the folks have decided they want to get involved in local politics on a more personal note. GE&P has received numerous questions and complaints about the process so far. In this post, we hope to answer at least some of these inquiries.
SC Code of Law provides very clear guidelines for the process of reorganization of political parties. SCGOP Rules provide additional guidelines for the Republican Party. ( For those who would like to read the entire texts, the information can be found under Title 7- Elections, Chapter 9, Party organization, in the SC Code of Law and in Rule 5 of the SCGOP Rules.) For our purposes, we will concentrate on the SCGOP process in Berkeley County.
THE PRECINCT PACKET:
SCGOP Party Headquarters prepares a packet of information for each precinct in the county. Contained in this packet are all the legal forms necessary for reorganization, along with complete instruction on conducting the meeting, and a list of all the Republican voters in that precinct. It is very helpful to receive this packet in a timely manner so the organizer can contact as many people as possible who wish to participate. This year, the precinct packets were picked up in Columbia by the BCGOP leadership on February 7, 2009. Ten days later, on February 16, 2009, an executive committee meeting was held at Eagle Landing to distribute the packets. Only members of the executive committe were notified of this meeting.
NOTIFICATION:
At this point, GE&P thinks it might be helpful for all to know the legal requirements for notification of reorganization.
Section 7-9-50 SC Code of Law
"A notice must be published by the county committee once a week for two consecutive weeks not more than three weeks nor less than two weeks before the meeting date in a newspaper having general circulation in the county."
This cycle, the first notice appeared in the P&C on February 19, 2009, two weeks before the actual reorganization meeting and three days after the meeting to distribute the packets. The second notice appeared on February 26, 2009, one week before the actual meeting on March 5, 2009. It should be apparent to all how this schedule could be problematic for those, other than members of the executive committee, who wished to participate.
It is important for the reader to understand that "reorganization " is not a one event deal. It is a process that contains several steps. It is imperative for the public to be aware of the times and places of each step. As everyone knows, this has not been the case during this year's process.
Originally, the packets should have been distributed in a timely manner. They were not.
There should have been public notice as to time and place for folks to pick up their packets. There was not.
The notifications should have been published in accordance with the Law. They were not.
There should have been instructions contained within the notifications as to where and when to return the packets. ( GE&P will expand upon this issue later in this post.) There were not.
In the notifications, there should have been a time, date, and place for the reorganization make-up meeting. There was not. The word on the street is that the chairman has said the make-up meeting will be held on March 19th at Eagle Landing but, to date, no one has received an official notice. At best, only members of the executive committee will be notified as the chairman said he "had sent out letters". Does he have your address?
As of this writing, no one knows where the county convention will be held.
Now, we shall provide some additional information on the process of returning the packets to the chairman and some possibilities for your consideration as to why the process is as it is.
According to SCGOP Rules, ( rule 4 (c) (5) ) information contained in the packets must be returned to the chairman no later than five days after the original meeting. This rule has been thrown out the window. In the instructions this cycle and last, the packets had to be returned within 24 hours of the original meeting. Now, use your common sense. If you are the leadership and you want to maintain that position, you want to be certain you have a sufficient number of delegates at the county convention to assure your re-election. The only way to be sure this will be the outcome is to know, for certain, exactly how many delegates your opposition has. This is not rocket science. If the process was fair, the make-up meeting would be held on that fifth day after the original precinct meeting. But, who's talking about fair. We're talking about maintaining power.
If this situation was not so serious, it would be quite amusing. But, the behaviour and goals of the existing leadership is so transparent that it borders on the ridiculous. What better ways to assure that no new people, or your opposition, will participate in the process; don't tell anyone, except your supporters, when the meetings will be held; don't give any precinct packets to new people; wait until the last possible moment to announce meetings; hold meetings in inappropriate venues. In other words, make every step in the process as difficult, inconvenient, and secretive as possible.
GE&P always likes to end on a positive note. Therefore, take heart Berkeley County Republicans. Come to the make-up meeting and let your voices be heard. Come and be part of the effort to clean up this mess. Come to Eagle Landing on March 19, 2009. No time has been given for the meeting but you can bet GE&P will announce this as soon as the information becomes available.
SC Code of Law provides very clear guidelines for the process of reorganization of political parties. SCGOP Rules provide additional guidelines for the Republican Party. ( For those who would like to read the entire texts, the information can be found under Title 7- Elections, Chapter 9, Party organization, in the SC Code of Law and in Rule 5 of the SCGOP Rules.) For our purposes, we will concentrate on the SCGOP process in Berkeley County.
THE PRECINCT PACKET:
SCGOP Party Headquarters prepares a packet of information for each precinct in the county. Contained in this packet are all the legal forms necessary for reorganization, along with complete instruction on conducting the meeting, and a list of all the Republican voters in that precinct. It is very helpful to receive this packet in a timely manner so the organizer can contact as many people as possible who wish to participate. This year, the precinct packets were picked up in Columbia by the BCGOP leadership on February 7, 2009. Ten days later, on February 16, 2009, an executive committee meeting was held at Eagle Landing to distribute the packets. Only members of the executive committe were notified of this meeting.
NOTIFICATION:
At this point, GE&P thinks it might be helpful for all to know the legal requirements for notification of reorganization.
Section 7-9-50 SC Code of Law
"A notice must be published by the county committee once a week for two consecutive weeks not more than three weeks nor less than two weeks before the meeting date in a newspaper having general circulation in the county."
This cycle, the first notice appeared in the P&C on February 19, 2009, two weeks before the actual reorganization meeting and three days after the meeting to distribute the packets. The second notice appeared on February 26, 2009, one week before the actual meeting on March 5, 2009. It should be apparent to all how this schedule could be problematic for those, other than members of the executive committee, who wished to participate.
It is important for the reader to understand that "reorganization " is not a one event deal. It is a process that contains several steps. It is imperative for the public to be aware of the times and places of each step. As everyone knows, this has not been the case during this year's process.
Originally, the packets should have been distributed in a timely manner. They were not.
There should have been public notice as to time and place for folks to pick up their packets. There was not.
The notifications should have been published in accordance with the Law. They were not.
There should have been instructions contained within the notifications as to where and when to return the packets. ( GE&P will expand upon this issue later in this post.) There were not.
In the notifications, there should have been a time, date, and place for the reorganization make-up meeting. There was not. The word on the street is that the chairman has said the make-up meeting will be held on March 19th at Eagle Landing but, to date, no one has received an official notice. At best, only members of the executive committee will be notified as the chairman said he "had sent out letters". Does he have your address?
As of this writing, no one knows where the county convention will be held.
Now, we shall provide some additional information on the process of returning the packets to the chairman and some possibilities for your consideration as to why the process is as it is.
According to SCGOP Rules, ( rule 4 (c) (5) ) information contained in the packets must be returned to the chairman no later than five days after the original meeting. This rule has been thrown out the window. In the instructions this cycle and last, the packets had to be returned within 24 hours of the original meeting. Now, use your common sense. If you are the leadership and you want to maintain that position, you want to be certain you have a sufficient number of delegates at the county convention to assure your re-election. The only way to be sure this will be the outcome is to know, for certain, exactly how many delegates your opposition has. This is not rocket science. If the process was fair, the make-up meeting would be held on that fifth day after the original precinct meeting. But, who's talking about fair. We're talking about maintaining power.
If this situation was not so serious, it would be quite amusing. But, the behaviour and goals of the existing leadership is so transparent that it borders on the ridiculous. What better ways to assure that no new people, or your opposition, will participate in the process; don't tell anyone, except your supporters, when the meetings will be held; don't give any precinct packets to new people; wait until the last possible moment to announce meetings; hold meetings in inappropriate venues. In other words, make every step in the process as difficult, inconvenient, and secretive as possible.
GE&P always likes to end on a positive note. Therefore, take heart Berkeley County Republicans. Come to the make-up meeting and let your voices be heard. Come and be part of the effort to clean up this mess. Come to Eagle Landing on March 19, 2009. No time has been given for the meeting but you can bet GE&P will announce this as soon as the information becomes available.
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
WHO YA GONNA CALL ???
GE&P has learned there was a drive by shooting in Cross last night. The incident occurred on Hwy 311 near the intersection with County Line Road.
According to neighbors, the shots were fired from a moving car at about 7PM. The shots were reported to number between 9 and 12. Two folks called 911, one at 7:08 and one at 7:12. Each reported the incident as a" drive by shooting". The 911 dispatcher informed each caller that an officer would be sent out.
At 7:30, the neighbors had gathered outside their homes waiting for the officer. One neighbor decided it would be helpful to the officer, when he arrived, to locate the spent shells and mark their positions. This neighbor retrieved some reflective cones from his garage. The neighbors began to walk the sides of the road to locate the brass. They found 6 shells and marked each with a cone. Still the officer had not arrived.
By this time, it was 8:15. One neighbor decided to call 911, again. This call was made and the caller was informed that "this had been a very busy night but an officer would be there soon".
In the meantime, one neighbor called a friend to tell her what was happening. This friend happened to have another friend who works in the sheriff's department. This third friend was called. This member of the sheriff's office immediately called the neighbor (victim) back to find out what had happened. From there, things began to happen as they should have from the start.
Once the sheriff's department found out about the incident, the wheels began to turn and the neighborhood received the proper attention.
The sheriff's department was not notified of the severity of the incident until after 8:25. An officer arrived at 8:40 and a detective arrived at 9:00.
GE&P found out that the 911 dispatcher had, indeed, received the original calls at 7:08PM and 7:12PM. The dispatcher did not report this incident to the sheriff's office until 7:55PM. Even then, it was reported as a "discharge of a firearm" instead of a "drive by shooting".
The sheriff assured GE&P he intends to fully investigate not only the incident but the handling of the calls. Our question is this........how can the citizens of Berkeley County expect the sheriff to be able to do his job if we cannot count on our 911 service to do it's job properly? GE&P strongly suggests we support our sheriff by demanding better performance from our 911 service. Perhaps this service needs to be put back under the control of the sheriff's department.
According to neighbors, the shots were fired from a moving car at about 7PM. The shots were reported to number between 9 and 12. Two folks called 911, one at 7:08 and one at 7:12. Each reported the incident as a" drive by shooting". The 911 dispatcher informed each caller that an officer would be sent out.
At 7:30, the neighbors had gathered outside their homes waiting for the officer. One neighbor decided it would be helpful to the officer, when he arrived, to locate the spent shells and mark their positions. This neighbor retrieved some reflective cones from his garage. The neighbors began to walk the sides of the road to locate the brass. They found 6 shells and marked each with a cone. Still the officer had not arrived.
By this time, it was 8:15. One neighbor decided to call 911, again. This call was made and the caller was informed that "this had been a very busy night but an officer would be there soon".
In the meantime, one neighbor called a friend to tell her what was happening. This friend happened to have another friend who works in the sheriff's department. This third friend was called. This member of the sheriff's office immediately called the neighbor (victim) back to find out what had happened. From there, things began to happen as they should have from the start.
Once the sheriff's department found out about the incident, the wheels began to turn and the neighborhood received the proper attention.
The sheriff's department was not notified of the severity of the incident until after 8:25. An officer arrived at 8:40 and a detective arrived at 9:00.
GE&P found out that the 911 dispatcher had, indeed, received the original calls at 7:08PM and 7:12PM. The dispatcher did not report this incident to the sheriff's office until 7:55PM. Even then, it was reported as a "discharge of a firearm" instead of a "drive by shooting".
The sheriff assured GE&P he intends to fully investigate not only the incident but the handling of the calls. Our question is this........how can the citizens of Berkeley County expect the sheriff to be able to do his job if we cannot count on our 911 service to do it's job properly? GE&P strongly suggests we support our sheriff by demanding better performance from our 911 service. Perhaps this service needs to be put back under the control of the sheriff's department.
Sunday, March 8, 2009
SMASHING SUCCESS
For those of you who missed the Berkeley County Republican Breakfast Club meeting yesterday, we would like to announce that it was a rousing success. There was an overflow crowd in attendance. As usual, the food was outstanding and still a bargain at $5.00. GE&P has noticed the crowds at the breakfast are much larger since the failed coup last year. We wonder what that's all about. We digress.
The program Saturday morning was aimed at introducing local Republicans to the candidates vying to fill the position of State Chairman. As we all know, Katon will not be seeking reelection. This fact alone should provide irrefutable proof to atheists that there really is a God.
All three candidates were there with their networking hats placed firmly on their heads. Rick Beltram, county chairman for 10 years in Spartanburg, Kevin Hall, and Karen Floyd each took their turn at the podium. Each touted his/her accomplishments. Each proclaimed his/her love for the Republican Party. Each explained why he/she would be the best person for the job.
It wasn't until the Q&A portion of the program that an actual difference in the philosophy of one candidate began to surface. A member of the audience asked all three how he/she would react if contacted by Republicans about corruption in their county organization. Mr. Beltram informed the questioner that it is illegal for the State Chairman to get involved in the business of county organizations. He went on to say that there are avenues in place to address any problems that might arise. First, one should appeal to the County Leadership. He said the State Executive Committee is there to hear appeals and, if all else fails, one can contact the State Attorney General. Golly gee, I wonder why the group of Berkeley County Republicans who have been fighting corruption in the county organization for many years didn't think of these actions? Does anyone out there remember the attempted hostile take-over of the breakfast club? Let's see if we can recall exactly who was involved in that. Oh yea, the County Chairman, the BC State Executive Committeeman, and some really high placed individual at party headquarters.
Mr. Hall echoed the same sentiments in his answer to the question. He agreed the State Chairman should never get involved.
Karen Floyd, in her response, seemed to grasp the nuance of the scenario. She realized the questioner was not referring to a situation of day to day operational issues where folks might have a simple difference of opinion. She realized he was referring to blatant corruption. She realized he was referring to the violation of SC Code of Law and the total disregard of SCGOP Rules. Mrs. Floyd answered appropriately and much to the approval of the audience by saying she would never get involved in the regular business of any county organization BUT if she was ever made aware of corruption and the violation of SC Code of Law or SCGOP Rules, she would definitely intervene. She indicated that she thought it is the duty and responsibility of the State Chairman to assure that the party organizations are being run legally and in accordance with the Rules.
Judging from the reaction, these statements seemed to provided a breath of fresh air to the members of the club. Considering their mindset, brought on by the trials and tribulations of the actions of a corrupt leadership, this crowd was not ready to hear a spouting of regurgitated bureaucratic BS. They wanted some good old, common sense straight talk on this issue. Karen's answer seemed to provide just that.
The program Saturday morning was aimed at introducing local Republicans to the candidates vying to fill the position of State Chairman. As we all know, Katon will not be seeking reelection. This fact alone should provide irrefutable proof to atheists that there really is a God.
All three candidates were there with their networking hats placed firmly on their heads. Rick Beltram, county chairman for 10 years in Spartanburg, Kevin Hall, and Karen Floyd each took their turn at the podium. Each touted his/her accomplishments. Each proclaimed his/her love for the Republican Party. Each explained why he/she would be the best person for the job.
It wasn't until the Q&A portion of the program that an actual difference in the philosophy of one candidate began to surface. A member of the audience asked all three how he/she would react if contacted by Republicans about corruption in their county organization. Mr. Beltram informed the questioner that it is illegal for the State Chairman to get involved in the business of county organizations. He went on to say that there are avenues in place to address any problems that might arise. First, one should appeal to the County Leadership. He said the State Executive Committee is there to hear appeals and, if all else fails, one can contact the State Attorney General. Golly gee, I wonder why the group of Berkeley County Republicans who have been fighting corruption in the county organization for many years didn't think of these actions? Does anyone out there remember the attempted hostile take-over of the breakfast club? Let's see if we can recall exactly who was involved in that. Oh yea, the County Chairman, the BC State Executive Committeeman, and some really high placed individual at party headquarters.
Mr. Hall echoed the same sentiments in his answer to the question. He agreed the State Chairman should never get involved.
Karen Floyd, in her response, seemed to grasp the nuance of the scenario. She realized the questioner was not referring to a situation of day to day operational issues where folks might have a simple difference of opinion. She realized he was referring to blatant corruption. She realized he was referring to the violation of SC Code of Law and the total disregard of SCGOP Rules. Mrs. Floyd answered appropriately and much to the approval of the audience by saying she would never get involved in the regular business of any county organization BUT if she was ever made aware of corruption and the violation of SC Code of Law or SCGOP Rules, she would definitely intervene. She indicated that she thought it is the duty and responsibility of the State Chairman to assure that the party organizations are being run legally and in accordance with the Rules.
Judging from the reaction, these statements seemed to provided a breath of fresh air to the members of the club. Considering their mindset, brought on by the trials and tribulations of the actions of a corrupt leadership, this crowd was not ready to hear a spouting of regurgitated bureaucratic BS. They wanted some good old, common sense straight talk on this issue. Karen's answer seemed to provide just that.
Monday, March 2, 2009
SOLUTION? SIMPLE. FOLLOW THE RULES
GE&P was inundated with telephone calls this past weekend. It seems a large number of Berkeley County Republicans are concerned about some issues. All of the callers knew our reorganization meetings are being held this Thursday, March 5th. All knew the individual precinct meetings are being held at the regular voting locations in each precinct. There was no confusion on that level. But, all of the callers were totally confused about the make-up meeting and the county convention. They were calling for a clarification on the wording of the SC Code of Law and the SCGOP Rules pertaining to reorganization.
According to both sources, a make-up meeting must be held in order to address unfinished business left over from the original reorganization meetings. This process gives people who were unable to attend the original meetings, the ability to participate in reorganization. According to the Law and the Rules, this make-up meeting must be held in a central location. For the benefit of the leadership and any parliamentarians reading this post, this means there has to be a make-up meeting and the meeting has to be held in one place with any or all precincts attending.
It seems all of the callers had heard that the chairman, Wade Arnette, had decided not to hold a make-up meeting. Also, they heard Mr. Arnette said that if the meeting was held, it would not be one collective meeting with all precincts attending. Instead, it would be individual meetings held at their polling place in each precinct exactly like their original meeting.
GE&P decided to clarify the confusion by going directly to the horse's mouth. We contacted the chairman, Mr. Wade Arnette. We asked where and when the make-up meeting is scheduled. Mr. Arnette said he had not decided whether or not a make-up meeting would be held. GE&P reminded Mr. Arnette that the Law and Rules dictate such a meeting. Mr. Arnette informed us he knew the Law and the Rules and did not need us to tell him what they are. We told Mr. Arnette GE&P was not suggesting he did not know the Laws and Rules. Our question was whether or not he intended to follow the Laws and Rules.
Then, Mr. Arnette asked how we could expect him to tell anyone where the make-up meeting would be held when he didn't even know where the county convention was to be held. At that point, GE&P sadly realized we had come to the proverbial hen house for wool. It is blatantly obvious that the only solution to this disregard for Rules and Law, this total lack of organization and planning, and this unprofessional behavior is a polar shift in leadership for the Berkeley County Republican Party organization.
According to both sources, a make-up meeting must be held in order to address unfinished business left over from the original reorganization meetings. This process gives people who were unable to attend the original meetings, the ability to participate in reorganization. According to the Law and the Rules, this make-up meeting must be held in a central location. For the benefit of the leadership and any parliamentarians reading this post, this means there has to be a make-up meeting and the meeting has to be held in one place with any or all precincts attending.
It seems all of the callers had heard that the chairman, Wade Arnette, had decided not to hold a make-up meeting. Also, they heard Mr. Arnette said that if the meeting was held, it would not be one collective meeting with all precincts attending. Instead, it would be individual meetings held at their polling place in each precinct exactly like their original meeting.
GE&P decided to clarify the confusion by going directly to the horse's mouth. We contacted the chairman, Mr. Wade Arnette. We asked where and when the make-up meeting is scheduled. Mr. Arnette said he had not decided whether or not a make-up meeting would be held. GE&P reminded Mr. Arnette that the Law and Rules dictate such a meeting. Mr. Arnette informed us he knew the Law and the Rules and did not need us to tell him what they are. We told Mr. Arnette GE&P was not suggesting he did not know the Laws and Rules. Our question was whether or not he intended to follow the Laws and Rules.
Then, Mr. Arnette asked how we could expect him to tell anyone where the make-up meeting would be held when he didn't even know where the county convention was to be held. At that point, GE&P sadly realized we had come to the proverbial hen house for wool. It is blatantly obvious that the only solution to this disregard for Rules and Law, this total lack of organization and planning, and this unprofessional behavior is a polar shift in leadership for the Berkeley County Republican Party organization.
SHOW US THE LEADERSHIP
Last week the SCAC, the South Carolina Association of Counties, held it's mid year conference.
On Wednesday, at the general session, the members discussed the plethora of problems facing the counties. They discussed the fact that the State is finding it necessary to cut funding to local governments in these difficult economic times. When local government funding to subdivisions, meaning counties, is cut, counties must find funding elsewhere, cut back on spending, or cut services. Berkeley County has learned that these cuts will amount to a loss of multi-millions of dollars to the county. They, also, discussed pending legislation and what impact this will have on county governments.
Wednesday evening, the various county delegations arranged to stay late in order to meet with their county representatives. The delegations realized their county people would want to discuss these serious problems and get some first hand answers to their questions.
Well, the members of the Berkeley County Delegation did exactly what they were supposed to do. They stayed late to speak with our Supervisor, Mr. Dan Davis. They were there at the appointed time and place. They were ready. They were prepared. They were anticipating a productive meeting. They waited.............and waited.............and waited for over an hour. Finally, they realized they had been stood up, so they left. Mr. Davis never arrived.
The members of the Berkeley County Delegation were very concerned. Had Mr. Davis suddenly been taken ill? Had he been involved in a terrible accident? What unfortunate circumstances could have prevented him from attending this all important meeting? After all, the county taxpayers footed the bill for this trip.
Then, the concerns of the members of our Delegation were put to rest. Mr. Davis was not ill. Mr. Davis was not injured in an accident. No misfortune had befallen him. The Berkeley County Delegation learned that Mr. Davis had simply skipped the meeting and, instead, attended a Carolina ball game.
On Wednesday, at the general session, the members discussed the plethora of problems facing the counties. They discussed the fact that the State is finding it necessary to cut funding to local governments in these difficult economic times. When local government funding to subdivisions, meaning counties, is cut, counties must find funding elsewhere, cut back on spending, or cut services. Berkeley County has learned that these cuts will amount to a loss of multi-millions of dollars to the county. They, also, discussed pending legislation and what impact this will have on county governments.
Wednesday evening, the various county delegations arranged to stay late in order to meet with their county representatives. The delegations realized their county people would want to discuss these serious problems and get some first hand answers to their questions.
Well, the members of the Berkeley County Delegation did exactly what they were supposed to do. They stayed late to speak with our Supervisor, Mr. Dan Davis. They were there at the appointed time and place. They were ready. They were prepared. They were anticipating a productive meeting. They waited.............and waited.............and waited for over an hour. Finally, they realized they had been stood up, so they left. Mr. Davis never arrived.
The members of the Berkeley County Delegation were very concerned. Had Mr. Davis suddenly been taken ill? Had he been involved in a terrible accident? What unfortunate circumstances could have prevented him from attending this all important meeting? After all, the county taxpayers footed the bill for this trip.
Then, the concerns of the members of our Delegation were put to rest. Mr. Davis was not ill. Mr. Davis was not injured in an accident. No misfortune had befallen him. The Berkeley County Delegation learned that Mr. Davis had simply skipped the meeting and, instead, attended a Carolina ball game.
Sunday, March 1, 2009
REORGANIZATION
Berkeley County Republicans will be thrilled to learn that reorganization is going along swimmingly. There was an Executive Committee meeting held on February 16, 2009. The purpose of this meeting was to explain reorganization to the new people, set dates for the precinct reorganization and make-up meetings, and to distribute the precinct packets to those who wished to organize their precincts.
Well, several weevils appeared in the cornmeal even before the meeting could be completed. The first oddity was the vote conducted by "the dark side" to set the reorganization meeting on March 5, 2009, which is a Thursday instead of the customary Tuesday. Next, the make-up meeting was set for March 19, 2009, two weeks after the initial meeting instead of the customary one week.
Then, the fun really began. There were several people who attended the meeting to pick up packets for previously unorganized precincts. These folks presented their voter registration cards to prove they were legitimate members of their precinct clubs. At this point, Wayland Moody informed them they could not have their packets. When GE&P asked why, he said the chairman had to take care of unorganized precincts. As it turned out, there was no malace intended. There had been a simple failure to communicate. When a large number of attendees learned that some people were being refused receipt of their packets and approached Mr. Moody to question his determination, Mr. Moody informed the crowd that he had simply misunderstood the request. It seemed, according to Mr. Moody, that he didn't realize that these people were members of the precincts for which they were requesting packets. (voter registration cards?)
According to Mr. Moody, the only remaining problem was that the packets being requested were not there at the meeting. Then the chairman, Mr. Arnette , came to the rescue and announced that the remaining packets were in the trunk of his car out in the parking lot. Mr. Moody questioned the validity of this contention. Oblivious to the winks and nods, Mr Arnette went to his car and returned with the packets. Our question here would be, "How did Mr. Arnette determine which packets to bring into the meeting and which ones to leave in the trunk of his car?" We digress.
We can assure the reader that everyone involved in this exchange saw this situation for what it was.......simply a failure to communicate. Judging from past history, no one would dare suspect any duplicity.
From "Wisdom Of The Ages"
"When one anticipates encountering a situation where laws and rules are likely to be ignored, bring with one a large crowd of tall, angry men to back one up."
Well, several weevils appeared in the cornmeal even before the meeting could be completed. The first oddity was the vote conducted by "the dark side" to set the reorganization meeting on March 5, 2009, which is a Thursday instead of the customary Tuesday. Next, the make-up meeting was set for March 19, 2009, two weeks after the initial meeting instead of the customary one week.
Then, the fun really began. There were several people who attended the meeting to pick up packets for previously unorganized precincts. These folks presented their voter registration cards to prove they were legitimate members of their precinct clubs. At this point, Wayland Moody informed them they could not have their packets. When GE&P asked why, he said the chairman had to take care of unorganized precincts. As it turned out, there was no malace intended. There had been a simple failure to communicate. When a large number of attendees learned that some people were being refused receipt of their packets and approached Mr. Moody to question his determination, Mr. Moody informed the crowd that he had simply misunderstood the request. It seemed, according to Mr. Moody, that he didn't realize that these people were members of the precincts for which they were requesting packets. (voter registration cards?)
According to Mr. Moody, the only remaining problem was that the packets being requested were not there at the meeting. Then the chairman, Mr. Arnette , came to the rescue and announced that the remaining packets were in the trunk of his car out in the parking lot. Mr. Moody questioned the validity of this contention. Oblivious to the winks and nods, Mr Arnette went to his car and returned with the packets. Our question here would be, "How did Mr. Arnette determine which packets to bring into the meeting and which ones to leave in the trunk of his car?" We digress.
We can assure the reader that everyone involved in this exchange saw this situation for what it was.......simply a failure to communicate. Judging from past history, no one would dare suspect any duplicity.
From "Wisdom Of The Ages"
"When one anticipates encountering a situation where laws and rules are likely to be ignored, bring with one a large crowd of tall, angry men to back one up."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)