Could it be possible that the City of Goose Creek really does have two mayors? We all know about Mayor Heitzler, who is supposedly a man of his word; who is supposed to be a straight shooter; who has the reputation of looking people in the eye and telling them only the truth. This mayor was and is well known and, up until now, thought of only in the highest regard. But, for many citizens in the area, the atmosphere surrounding this mayor has changed and soured over the last few days. Some of these people question, "Is he, indeed, a man of his word?" They wonder, "Is he really a straight shooter?" And, most of all, they ponder, "Will this man look some of us straight in the face and tell us the most egregious lies?"
GE&P has a theory, of course. We think that Mayor Heitzler could possible have an "Evil Twin" that he doesn't even know about. This "Evil Twin" has managed to keep himself secreted away until just lately and this "Evil Twin" has gone on a rampage of very reprehensible activities aimed at tarnishing the reputation of the real mayor.
First, the "Evil Twin" attended the Berkeley County Republican Breakfast Club meeting on June 2, 2012, masquerading as Mayor Heitzler. (Where the real mayor was during this time is unknown.) The "Evil Twin" proceeded to give a very impressive speech outlining the successes achieved by the City of Goose Creek over the last year. After this speech, the "Evil Twin" mingled with the crowd. The "Evil Twin" engaged in conversations with many of the candidates and elected officials who were in attendance.
After the meeting, the "Evil Twin" tarried outside the meeting hall, continuing to participate in conversations about local races and local elected officials. This was when the "Evil Twin" engaged in some activities that might eventually cause the real mayor some difficulty. The "Evil Twin" even cozied up to the challenger in the County Council District 3 race. The "Evil Twin" explained to all in the group that, since Goose Creek operates on a non-partisin system, he could not actively support the challenger in this race but, he promised not to do anything to harm the challenger either. Did that "Evil Twin" really make all those derogatory remarks about the incumbent in that race? Did he really refer to Dan Davis as a "little dictator"? You'll have to ask the seven people in that group, including yours truly, who were listening to the "Evil Twin".
Then, just last week, the "Evil Twin" struck, again, on another issue. The RINO Hunters Club put up only ONE "issue" sign in Goose Creek. That sign criticized Councilman Call's voting record because he supported the closing of the BC Satellite office . The group had put up small RINO signs beside every Bob Call sign in the city. Within hours, their ONE large sign had been removed. The Code Enforcement Officer explained that it was against Goose Creek Sign Ordinance to erect any political signs within any Right Of Way within the City of Goose Creek. Be aware, there was a Call political sign of the same dimensions within feet of the sign in question. After the argument about the positioning of the sign fizzled because of the presence of the Call sign, the next explanation from the Code Enforcement Officer from Goose Creek was that the anti-Call sign did not qualify as a "political sign". He explained, in order for a sign to be considered a "political sign", it had to say "Elect Whomever to Whatever Office". (such as "Call for County Council", maybe?) According to this officer, if someone put up a sign that said, "Bob Call Voted Himself a Raise, Twice", he would not consider that sign a "political" sign and would order that it should be removed. (Are we getting the picture?)
Originally, the Code Enforcement Officer said HE HAD TAKEN THE SIGN DOWN HIMSELF. By the end of this exchange, he said he didn't know what had happened to the sign and that, "if anyone was interested, they should contact the Goose Creek Police". When an attempt was made to point out the discrepancy in his statements, he hung up the phone. As all would agree, it was time to contact the head man for some justice. Rats, this call was intercepted by none other than the "Evil Twin".
Before the situation could be properly outlined, the "Evil Twin" interrupted by saying that it was illegal to place any signs within any Right of Way within the City of Goose Creek. When it was pointed out that many of Bob Call's signs were located within the Rights of Way all over town, the "Evil Twin" said, "Well, maybe Mr. Call has permission to have his signs there." The "Evil Twin" was asked, "How could Mr. Call go about receiving permission to violate the law?" Then the "Evil Twin" said, "He could get permission from the owner of the land adjacent to the Right of Way." (Are you as confused as we are?) He went on to insist that, even in the County, anyone wanting to erect a political sign along the road has to get SIGNED permission from the owner of the land adjacent to the Right of Way in question. (By the way, the Code Enforcement Officials from Berkeley County strongly disagree with his statement and insist there is no such requirement.)
When asked why ONE differing sign was targeted by Goose Creek when Bob Call has signs all over town that violate the Ordinance, the "Evil Twin" said the City only removes signs when complaints are received. When an attempt was made to issue formal complaints about all the violating Call signs, the "Evil Twin" became obviously irritated. He said, if there is any proof that Mr. Call did not have permission from the adjacent land owners to erect his signs, he would consider removing them. (So the "Evil Twin" thinks it's OK for someone to break the law as long as they have permission from whomever?)The "Evil Twin" displayed absolutely no professionalism and stated he did not have any more time to devote to this issue and hung up the phone.
The handling of this sign issue was very confusing at first, but, as with most things, time answers all questions. Our answer came on Friday when we learned that a letter was being circulated, supposedly signed by Mayor Heitzler. This letter was an open endorsement of none other than Bob Call. But, don't be fooled. It is possible that this letter was really forged by the "Evil Twin" with the diabolical intent to convince the public (falsely, of course) that the real mayor is a two faced, back stabbing, double dealing, bald faced liar.
Now before anyone gets the wrong idea about our point, we firmly believe that anyone should be free to endorse the candidate of their choice; just don't lie about it. Could it be the "Evil Twin" has actually struck, again? There is no way that we believe anyone would even consider that a duly elected official would use the power of their office to illegally interfere with an election. Right? Right. Neither do we believe that the real mayor would even consider perpetrating such an obvious fraud on the members of the BCRPBC. He's far too smart to think he could, in the long run, get away with such a double dealing trick.
BAD, BAD, EVIL TWIN.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
No! They have a mayor who is obviously committing and setting in place a "real" possibility for a fraudulent political election favoring his candidate come Tuesday!! Because some of the media, when contacted, decided NOT to cover this issue, the liberals managed to keep yet another disgraceful act by Bob Call from his constituents!! However, this blog is trying to show Bob Calls' "true colors", which are very "shady"!! District 3 voters, please come out and vote for Mr. Ken Gunn and show (Mr. Call and the Mayor) that it is possible to "win" a political campaign WITHOUT violating campaign laws and ordinances!
Eventually all of the crap conducted by SOB (Sweet OLD Bob)and his fellow RINOS Jackass Shurlknight and Dictator Dan will come to light and Mayor Mike will have a hard time convincing his voters in Goooosse Creeek they should re-anoint his Majesty come election time.
I for one am VERY, VERY disappointed in the mayor.. HOW COULD HE? Should it be time for someone to run against the mayor next election? Turn out was dismal at my polling place... what did it look like in BC? How will we find out who won?
Even though we WON, it is soooo disappointing to know that approx. 42% of District 3 voters supported someone who is consistantly violating their TRUST; violating laws/ordinances; voluntarily participating in CORRUPT agendas set forth by Supervisor Dan Davis; and a general sense of irresponsibility!! Please "wake-up" before the general election in November 2012! Thank you the other 58% of voters! You ARE SMART!
Post a Comment